Advertise || XML Feed || Add to My Yahoo! || Bookmark

January 31, 2006

Misspelling Tiananmen

Posted by Eric at 4:30 pm. Filed under: Randomly Interesting

Paul Boutin has noticed that the Chinese Google filter only works if you can spell.

Image results for the correct spelling.

Now try Tianenmen, Tienanmen and Tiananman.

Danny Sullivan has side by side pictures of results of searching for Tiananmen on google.com and google.cn.


Trackback URI:
http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2006/01/31/misspelling-tiananmen/trackback/

SOTU in 16 Words

Posted by Eric at 11:18 am. Filed under: General

Jason at Generation Why has a suggested shorter State of the Union address.

Economy up. Wiretaps work. Adios terrorists. Here comes the veto. Borders will be closed. Thank you.”

LaShawn and Michelle want Bush to address illegal immigration.


Trackback URI:
http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2006/01/31/sotu-in-16-words/trackback/

Samuel A. Alito is Confirmed as Supreme Court Justice

Posted by Eric at 11:11 am. Filed under: Courts / Legal, Samuel A. Alito

The Senate is still voting, but they have crossed the 51 yes votes needed for confirmation.


Trackback URI:
http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2006/01/31/samuel-a-alito-is-confirmed-as-supreme-court-justice/trackback/

Muslim Outrage Over Danish Cartoons Exposes Islam.

Posted by Taste of Liberty at 9:04 am. Filed under: General

Does it strike anyone as odd that Muslims can burn synagogues, desecrate symbols of Israel and Judaism, burn the American flag, malign and brutalize Christianity and no one seems to care? Such activity is even applauded.

Does it strike anyone as odd that Muslims can send their young children as bombs to blow up other innocent young children and no one seems to care? Parents even revel in such possibility reaping cash rewards from the likes of Saddam Hussein for enrolling their children as suicide bombers.

Silence… Even at times an apologetic from the liberal media.

Does it strike anyone as odd that Muslims can brutally murder “hostages” they take, torture them on television, and no one seems to care? Just part of the struggle we’re told.

Silence, more silence.

Does it strike anyone as odd that Muslims can shoot up schools full of young children like was recently done in Afghanistan and no one seems to care?

The silence is growing louder.

And yet some cartoons are published in Denmark which in some strange way exposes Islam and the Muslim hierarchy stirs up the masses to, not only protest, but to become violent and destructive. Their behaviour underscores the truth about the current state of Islam.

‘Dare not anyone expose Islam to the world or else,’ so the message goes. The ironic thing is that Muslims, by their behavior, are doing that very thing.

The sad thing, the really tragic thing, is that many, many people wearing the banner of Islam are doing so only because of force, coercion, intimidation, and brain washing. If Islam were true, as its proponents claim, then why are they afraid of other ideas and viewpoints? Why are they afraid of falsehood if their way will prove to be true? Or do they inherently know something else and are petrified of being exposed? Are they afraid their way will not stand up to scrutiny? What is it that explains their strange behaviour?

It would seem to this observer that Islamists are exposing themselves. The media may be intimidated or fooled or willingly blind, but to the average person Islamists appear to be who they are; madmen bent on tyranny. To the observer it seems they will not be satisfied until they have killed or subjugated everyone they consider an infidel. Peaceful co-existence is not in their vocabulary. And if they have to use their own children as bombs to achieve that end they will, and gladly. If they have to desecrate and destroy the icons of others they will do so, and gladly. If they have to maim, torture, and kill innocents in public view to instill fear and intimidate they will do so, and gladly.

But just don’t you dare publish a cartoon that reveals that. Now that is really evil.

*****

UPDATE: Others commenting include:

Mary Madigan: “Muslims armed with assault rifles and grenade launchers rallied outside the European Union headquarters in Gaza City and fired shots in the air, demanding an apology for cartoons that dissed Islam by relating it to terrorism. ”

Radio Free Mike:

Right now Danes and Norwegians and Swedes have to fear for their lives in the Middle East because of something in a “Danish newspaper”; sales of “Danish goods” have all but come to a halt. This is just ignorant nasty nationalism. I don’t care whose religion is offended. (You can look at the cartoons here.) “We call on Muslim nations to boycott all Danish products because the Danish people supported the hateful racism under the pretext of freedom of expression,” Hamas wrote in a statement. It’s hateful enough that these racists are now in charge of a government; even worse that the boycott is working. But western leaders have stepped up to defend our traditions of free speech, right? They won’t let fundamentalists in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Iraq, the Palestinian territories, Pakistan, or anywhere else dictate what European newspapers publish. Right?

Um, no.

ZombieTime posts an image archive of pictures of Mohammed through the ages. Ian Miller at LiveJournal is scared by this: “Meanwhile pan-Arab organisations have begun efforts to reach a UN resolution, backed by possible sanctions, to protect religions from insults.”

Collission Commentary adds: “It’s simply part of life in a globalised world that other people have an opinion about you. Western countries get their fair share of critisism (much of it deserved), and most have learned to deal with it. Why should there be an exception for the Arab World? There are good reasons for critisism against the region that’s the worlds prime exporter of religious violence and hate. ”

Otto Praline: “It is certainly not the paper’s fault that irrational devotees of Islam have taken it upon themselves to speak for their entire faith and threaten death to those who drew the cartoons and demand that their countries and citizens boycott Danish goods. […] Our politically correct sensitivity sours the vigor of our ideals and gives the impression that anyone can demand that we shut up because their feelings get hurt.”

Winds of Change: “All of [the cartoons are] more innocuous than the typical editorial cartoon about Ariel Sharon, back when he was the most hated politician in the world.”


Trackback URI:
http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2006/01/31/muslim-outrage-over-danish-cartoons-exposes-islam/trackback/

Gay Blogger Claims to Blackmail Senator on Alito Vote

Posted by Eric at 7:51 am. Filed under: Courts / Legal, Samuel A. Alito

Michael at BlogActive appears to be publicly blackmailing a Senator.

Mr. Senator:

Tomorrow you will be faced with a vote that may have the longest aftereffects of any other you have cast in your Senate career.

Tomorrow you will decide if your political position is worth more than doing what is right for others like you. For others like you, Mr. Senator, who engage in oral sex with other men. (Although, Mr. Senator, most of us don’t do in the bathrooms of Union Station!) Your fake marriage, by the way, will NOT protect you from the truth being told on this blog.

How does this blog decide who to report on? It’s simple. We report on hypocrites. In this case, hypocrites who vote against the gay and lesbian community while engaging in gay sex themselves*.

When you cast that vote, Mr. Senator, represent your own…it’s the least you could do.

Michael Rogers
blogACTIVE.com

*While votes on many matters are considered, votes “FOR” either the Alito nomination and the Federal Marriage Amendment are enough to qualify legislators for reporting on this site.

Ian Schwartz responds: “Michael Rogers at BlogActive is gay himself and here I thought that gays wanted people to be tolerate of their lifestyle. Oh wait, that’s only if you’re a gay liberal. My bad, sorry. ”

Adam Graham, of Adam’s Blog, observes: “Subversion, blackmail, and deceit is all that’s left to the unhinged left.”

Daniel at The Mechanical Eye rants:

… brilliant, man. The Democrats were accused of being bullies armed only with smear tactics during Judiciary Committee hearings. So, in making a final stand, the activists are… bullying, armed only with smear tactics.

I mean, make an argument! Tell us why Alito is so wicked, how he’ll send children back into the coal mines and burn gay men at the stake and force women back into the kitchen and make the menfolk sandwiches.

UPDATE: Some readers may be curious as to what the legal definition of “blackmail” is. Section 22-3252 of the D. C. Code defines blackmail as containing the following elements.

1. The defendant threatened to accuse another of a crime or to expose a secret or publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject the other party to hatred, contempt, or ridicule or to impair the reputation of the other party;

2. The defendant did so with the specific intent to obtain property of another or cause another person to do or refrain from doing any act.

Is what Mr. Rogers is doing criminal? Maybe, unless the whole thing is a big hoax designed to draw traffic to his blog. If that’s the case, it’s working. If it’s not a joke and he actually has sent such a letter, he will likely find himself in legal hot water for this stunt. Of course, the catch 22 of it is that by definition, the target of the blackmail is never one who wants to provide evidence and press charges.

UPDATE 2: Others are wondering about the legality, or lack thereof, of Michael Rogers’ actions.

Rob at Say Anything (via Lime Shurbet) says: “Don’t look now, but this gay witch hunt may well be against the law.”

NRO’s John Podhoretz: “I’m not a lawyer, so I don’t know if threatening an unnamed person constitutes blackmail. But it could…”

Kerfuffles: “The legal question is … is blackmail of a United States Senator legal? If not, can we expect “BlogActive” to receive a not so friendly visit from the FBI?”

McGehee comments over at OTB: “The man is a walking Godwin’s Law violation.”


Trackback URI:
http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2006/01/31/gay-blogger-blackmails-senator-on-alito-vote/trackback/

Video of Kennedy Going Nuts on Floor

Posted by Eric at 7:38 am. Filed under: Courts / Legal, Samuel A. Alito

Ian Schwartz, at his newly repainted blog ExposeTheLeft, has the video of Ted Kennedy losing it on the Senate floor yesterday.


Trackback URI:
http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2006/01/31/video-of-kennedy-going-nuts-on-floor/trackback/

Live Interview with George Sada Tomorrow

Posted by Eric at 7:35 am. Filed under: War / Terrorism

Jenni Vinson will be hosting an interview with General Sada on Wednesday morning from 8-9am with 1440 KEYS AM Radio in Corpus Christi, TX. Check it out. I’m not sure yet if this show will be streamed live, but if you’re in the area you should be able to tune in even if it’s not broadcast online.

He is the author of Saddam’s Secrets, which we discussed a few days ago.

UPDATE: Hannity & Colmes had Sada on few days ago. The video can be viewed here.


Trackback URI:
http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2006/01/31/live-interview-with-george-sada-tomorrow/trackback/

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here