You'll love Woods' Edge at Salt Creek Golf Retreat, Brown County, Indiana.
Life at Conception Act
There is a campaign underway to renew the focus on defining life as having begun at conception. The bill (HR 552) introduced back in Feb ‘05 is here. The Prolife Alliance has an interesting summary of why this would end abortion on demand without a constitutional ammendment.
When the Supreme Court handed down its now-infamous Roe v. Wade decision, it did so based on a new, previously undefined “right of privacy” which it “discovered” in so-called “emanations” of “penumbrae” of the Constitution.
Of course, as constitutional law it was a disaster. But never once did the Supreme Court declare abortion itself to be a Constitutional right.
Instead the Supreme Court said:
“We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. . . the judiciary at this point in the development of man’s knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer.”
Then the High Court made a key admission:
“If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant’s case [i.e. “Roe” who sought the abortion], of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life is then guaranteed by the [14th] Amendment.”
That’s exactly what a Life at Conception Act would do.
http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2006/01/05/life-at-conception-act/trackback/
nfl betting
Trackback by nfl betting — February 1, 2006 @ 7:01 am
hoodia
Trackback by hoodia — February 8, 2006 @ 3:37 am
betting-line
Trackback by betting-line — February 17, 2006 @ 9:59 pm
crib-bedding
Trackback by crib-bedding — February 21, 2006 @ 8:45 pm
swiss-replica
Trackback by swiss-replica — February 27, 2006 @ 1:56 pm
alprazolam
Trackback by alprazolam — February 27, 2006 @ 9:23 pm
diazepam
Trackback by diazepam — February 28, 2006 @ 1:29 am
ringtones
Trackback by ringtones — March 13, 2006 @ 8:52 pm
hydrocortisone
Trackback by hydrocortisone — April 12, 2006 @ 5:35 am