<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gorelick Supports Warrantless Domestic Surveillance</title>
	<link>http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/12/21/gorelick-supports-warrantless-domestic-surveillance/</link>
	<description>Enthusiasm Lacking Foresight</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan Leffingwell</title>
		<link>http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/12/21/gorelick-supports-warrantless-domestic-surveillance/#comment-37018</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/12/21/gorelick-supports-warrantless-domestic-surveillance/#comment-37018</guid>
					<description>Eric,

I based my observations on what I saw at BOB's site.  I stand by my observations.  We will have to agree to disagree, which is OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Eric,</p>
	<p>I based my observations on what I saw at BOB&#8217;s site.  I stand by my observations.  We will have to agree to disagree, which is OK.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric</title>
		<link>http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/12/21/gorelick-supports-warrantless-domestic-surveillance/#comment-37016</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/12/21/gorelick-supports-warrantless-domestic-surveillance/#comment-37016</guid>
					<description>Let's stick to facts and reasoned argument here at MZ and not resort to name calling (&quot;moonbat&quot;) and insults (&quot;can't think&quot;) please.  Bryan is attempting to make a reasonable argument and deserves a reasonable response.  I don't know enough about the original situation to really speak strongly to it, nor do I have the time right now, which is why I just briefly noted and linked to Michelle's observations in my roundup rather than commenting on them myself.

Though on the surface I don't have a problem with pointing out that someone who has been fined for eavesdropping has no moral high ground to yell at others about the same issue.  Whether or not it's smart to bring it up seems to really be Bryan's point, and I don't know about that so much, I'm not really a political strategist, just a regular guy observing the world.  :-)

Thanks.
Eric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Let&#8217;s stick to facts and reasoned argument here at MZ and not resort to name calling (&#8221;moonbat&#8221;) and insults (&#8221;can&#8217;t think&#8221;) please.  Bryan is attempting to make a reasonable argument and deserves a reasonable response.  I don&#8217;t know enough about the original situation to really speak strongly to it, nor do I have the time right now, which is why I just briefly noted and linked to Michelle&#8217;s observations in my roundup rather than commenting on them myself.</p>
	<p>Though on the surface I don&#8217;t have a problem with pointing out that someone who has been fined for eavesdropping has no moral high ground to yell at others about the same issue.  Whether or not it&#8217;s smart to bring it up seems to really be Bryan&#8217;s point, and I don&#8217;t know about that so much, I&#8217;m not really a political strategist, just a regular guy observing the world.  :-)</p>
	<p>Thanks.<br />
Eric.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan Leffingwell</title>
		<link>http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/12/21/gorelick-supports-warrantless-domestic-surveillance/#comment-37013</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/12/21/gorelick-supports-warrantless-domestic-surveillance/#comment-37013</guid>
					<description>Looks like the moonbat in the second trackback thinks (and I use that word loosely) that it's A-OK what McDermott did and completely disregards the plain-as-day truth that Baghdad Jim is a hypocrite and a lawbreaker himself (as evidenced by his $60,000 fine).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Looks like the moonbat in the second trackback thinks (and I use that word loosely) that it&#8217;s A-OK what McDermott did and completely disregards the plain-as-day truth that Baghdad Jim is a hypocrite and a lawbreaker himself (as evidenced by his $60,000 fine).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bryan O'Bryan</title>
		<link>http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/12/21/gorelick-supports-warrantless-domestic-surveillance/#comment-37011</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/12/21/gorelick-supports-warrantless-domestic-surveillance/#comment-37011</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;McDermott, Eavesdropping and poorly thought out arguments&lt;/strong&gt;

	The year was 1997.  A couple in Florida eavesdropped on a phone call by Representative Boehner (R).  The topic was the ethics investigation of Newt Gingritch.  This couple then sent a transcript of that phone call to Representative McDermott (D).  McD...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>McDermott, Eavesdropping and poorly thought out arguments</strong></p>
	<p>	The year was 1997.  A couple in Florida eavesdropped on a phone call by Representative Boehner (R).  The topic was the ethics investigation of Newt Gingritch.  This couple then sent a transcript of that phone call to Representative McDermott (D).  McD&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan Leffingwell</title>
		<link>http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/12/21/gorelick-supports-warrantless-domestic-surveillance/#comment-37009</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/12/21/gorelick-supports-warrantless-domestic-surveillance/#comment-37009</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the trackback, my friend!  Consider yourself blogrolled!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks for the trackback, my friend!  Consider yourself blogrolled!  :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
