Advertise || XML Feed || Add to My Yahoo! || Bookmark

March 17, 2005

Scalia on the “Living Constitution” Doctrine

Posted by Eric at 8:07 am. Filed under: General

ThreeBadFingers has an interesting transcript of a discussion with Justice Scalia.

Kent Hughes:
Mr. Justice Scalia, what do you think has caused the emergence of the Living Constitution doctrine? What were the forces in society, were there pressures that were not responded to by the legislature? What caused the emergence of this new doctrine?

Justice Scalia:
I don’t know. Perhaps the question should be: how did we get away without having it develop much sooner. I mean it’s enormously seductive to a judge. The Living Constitution judge is a happy fellow. He comes home at night and his wife says, “Dear, did you have a good day on the bench?” “Oh, yes. We had a constitutional case today. And you know what? The Constitution meant exactly what I thought it ought to mean!” Well of course it does, because that’s your only criterion. That’s a very seductive philosophy. So it’s no surprise that it should take the society by storm. And it is the same thing for the man or woman in the street: to know that everything you care passionately about, whether it’s abortion or suicide, or whatever you care passionately about, it’s there in the Constitution. What a happy feeling. That’s what causes it. And that’s what makes it hard to call the society back from it. It’s tough medicine.

OTB has some other observations about the interview.


Trackback URI:
http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/03/17/scalia-on-the-living-constitution-doctrine/trackback/

9 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/03/17/scalia-on-the-living-constitution-doctrine/trackback/

  1. Which is what Scalia would think…

    Did you know that the Canadian Constitution and its Charter (The Canadian Bill of Rights) are both legally, officially living documents? No argument there. Makes interpretation harder at times, but at least the original approach is consistent.

    Comment by Mark — March 18, 2005 @ 1:52 pm

  2. Your site is also very interesting, very calming effect just reading it. Will spend more time with certain areas. Well done and good luck with your work.

    Comment by Anonymous — July 10, 2005 @ 1:38 am

  3. Recommend this site for great pleasure.

    Comment by Anonymous — July 10, 2005 @ 10:47 am

  4. Good morning, I am new to this site. I have just learned about this site. I am going to read on and it’s very interesting to know

    Comment by Anonymous — July 12, 2005 @ 7:13 am

  5. Take your time to check out some relevant pages about… Thanks!!!

    Comment by Anonymous — July 14, 2005 @ 8:25 pm

  6. Our site is cool, but also yours is very nice too

    Comment by Anonymous — July 19, 2005 @ 6:15 am

  7. Thank you, I just wanted to give a greeting and tell you I like your website very much.

    Comment by Anonymous — July 19, 2005 @ 3:52 pm

  8. Nice site and fine content

    Comment by Anonymous — July 21, 2005 @ 5:05 am

  9. Please let me know if there are any equally great sites like this you can recommend to me. Thanks Again

    Comment by Anonymous — July 24, 2005 @ 4:23 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here