Russert Questions Kerry … Now?
Hugh Hewitt asks a great question about the Russert MTP interview with Kerry we blogged about last week:
THE SECOND SUBJECT for mulling is John Kerry’s extraordinary interview with Tim Russert last Sunday. There’s a lot to absorb here, including Kerry’s assertion that he did indeed run guns and CIA men into Cambodia on secret missions–and to aid the Khmer Rouge no less!
What is really remarkable is not Kerry’s whoppers–he couldn’t have meant the Khmer Rouge, right?–or his almost certain not-to-be-fulfilled pledge to sign the form 180. It is the set of questions Tim Russert posed.
Russert is generally regarded as the toughest interview in television, and he did bleed Kerry a bit during the campaign; afterwards Kerry never again came close to Russert’s set before November 2.
But if the questions posed by Russert on January 30, 2005–on Kerry’s fantasy life in Cambodia, on the sequestered records, etc.–were legitimate and useful inquiries after the votes have been cast, why then did no one pose them to candidate Kerry when they might have made a difference in the election? The blogosphere and the center-right media were full of such demands from August 1 forward, but not a single reporter from mainstream media bothered to pose even one of the Russert questions prior to the vote.
http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/02/03/russert-questions-kerry-now/trackback/
You'll love Woods' Edge at Salt Creek Golf Retreat, Brown County, Indiana.







Hello, I just wanted to say you have a very informative site which really made me think, Thanks ! A site with a wealth of info.!…thanks very much! Have a nice Day!!
Comment by Anonymous — July 8, 2005 @ 3:26 am
This is a great page. And the contents are really that worth reading. I will add this to my own library
Comment by Anonymous — July 9, 2005 @ 8:27 pm
Excellent Web Site! Very professional and full of great information. I am greatly enjoying it. Your enthusiasm is wonderful!!!
Comment by Anonymous — July 12, 2005 @ 2:25 am