Parenting for Promiscuity.
There’s buzzing about this NY Post Article splashing super skimpy prom dresses [warning, potentially offensive picture]. Blogging from Michelle Malkin, Ace of Spades, Palm Tree Pundit. Here’s the actual product site.
I’m not posting the picture here, but it’s shocking, and what’s even more shocking is that it’s supposedly one of the company’s “top 20 dresses nationwide.”
Palm Tree Pundit says it best:
He makes a good point, though. Who are the daddies, and where are they? They certainly don’t appear to be protecting their daughters, which is a large part of the daddy job description, in my view.
Girls who will wear prom dresses like the one in the link above are in for a world of heartache, I’m afraid. Their hearts, as well as their bodies, are in danger. Dads, please, please, don’t let your daughters dress like hookers.
And you thought Trashy Clothes were On the Way Out.
Michelle said months ago: Be “prudes.” Be “rude.” Be “shrill.” And never, ever feel ashamed for asking out loud: Have you no shame?
UPDATE: Wizbang says the New York Post took a picture of the model with the dress on backward, with photos to back it up.
http://myopiczeal.blogsome.com/2005/01/25/parenting-for-promiscuity/trackback/
You'll love Woods' Edge at Salt Creek Golf Retreat, Brown County, Indiana.







Aloha — Thanks so much for the link!
Anne
Comment by Anne — January 25, 2005 @ 10:43 am
rginia said the bill is: “simply bad law-making.” See somewhat related post: Parenting for Promiscuity.
8:17 am |
Trackback UR […]
Pingback by Myopic Zeal :: Underwear Laws :: January :: 2005 — January 26, 2005 @ 8:17 am
Finding your websight was like finding a needle in a haystack.
Comment by Anonymous — July 7, 2005 @ 11:30 pm
YOU HAVE GOT SOME KIND OF CLASS IN THIS SITE. Good to see you up and around!
Comment by Anonymous — July 10, 2005 @ 1:11 am
Just dropping in to let you know you have an interesting site. I hope you’ll continue to work on it. Wishing you all the best.
Comment by Anonymous — July 10, 2005 @ 10:27 am