The University of Oregon has ordered a campus employee to remove the yellow ribbon saying “Support our Troops” from his maintenance vehicle, claiming it was a political statement.
The question then is… what constitutes a political statement.
“I don’t think it’s political i think they’re just trying to support the guys who are putting their lives on the line for this country. be it right or wrong.. be it right or left,” said Lattion.
The trucks are part of a public institution.
Under state law… public employees can not use state resources to spread political messages.
From Kevin McCullough via Michelle Malkin.
And Jordan Golson has done a bit of homework here. He quotes from the University of Oregon Policy Statement on Prohibited Political Activities:
In compliance with ORS 260.432, the following notice required by statute is published:
“The restrictions imposed by the law of the State of Oregon on your political activities are that ‘No public employee shall solicit any money, influence, service or other thing of value or otherwise promote any political committee or promote or oppose the nomination or election of a candidate, the adoption of a measure or the recall of a public office holder while on the job during working hours. However, this section does not restrict the right of a public employee to express personal political views.”
“It is therefore the policy of the state and of your public employer that you may engage in political activity except to the extent prohibited by state law when on the job during working hours.”
And he graciously posts the contact information for the University President Dave Frohnmayer.
Classic quote from the UoO’s Diversity page.
Diversity is not casual liberal tolerance. Not polite accomodation. IT IS ACTION.
Right.
UPDATE: Mike makes an interesting point in his comment to this post, which is basically that it’s university property and they can do what they want in terms of preventing him from putting a ribbon on the vehicle. While that may be true (as long as they don’t selectively permit employees to speak with freedom), I have to take issue with this statement:
placing such objects on a state owned vehicle is implying the state’s endorsement as well which isn’t fair or desired. [Emphasis mine]
I’m not sure how one could possibly say it is not desirable that the state endorse the support of our troops. While I will grant that there is a difference between state and federal governments here, the federal government, theoretically representing the states, has sent these troops into battle, and better be supporting them with every possible resource.
UPDATE 2: Welcome Captain’s Quarters readers. :-)
UPDATE 2: The University responds.